Archive |
1099 Risk Blog
February, 3 2010
Budget 2011: the DOL Rises, and What's This $8 Billion For?Posted by Liz GreeneMonday's release of Obama's fiscal year 2011 Budget has generated a flurry of excitement among employment lawyers and contingent workforce program managers regarding an increase of $25 million specifically allocated for the Department of Labor (DOL) to go after worker misclassification in a joint effort with the Treasury. The efforts are expected to increase Treasury receipts by more than $7 billion over a ten year span (a figure I believe is underestimated based on my understanding of the tax gap). But the $25 million line item in the budget by itself doesn't tell the whole story of what's intended for the future of worker classification enforcement in Obama's 2011 budget proposal. There's more, and the other pieces actually dwarf the $25 million for the joint DOL-IRS enforcement plan. What's this $8 billion line item for, huh? And why aren't the pundits talking about that?
What the Budget Says About the DOL's Misclassification Enforcement Role
So, for starters, here's the summary description from the Obama budget document regarding the DOL-IRS joint misclassification enforcement program (for those of you who want to read in the full text, this passage starts on page 100 of the 2011 Budget):
When employees are misclassified as independent contractors, they are deprived of benefits and protections to which they are legally entitled. For example, independent contractors do not receive overtime and are ineligible to receive unemployment benefits. Misclassification also has a budgetary impact, reducing receipts in Treasury and the Social Security, Medicare and Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds. As part of the 2011 Budget, the Departments of Labor and Treasury are pursuing a joint proposal that eliminates incentives in law for employers to misclassify their employees; enhances the ability of both agencies to penalize employers who misclassify; and restores protections to employees who have been denied them because of their improper classification. This proposal would increase Treasury receipts by more than $7 billion over 10 years. The 2011 Budget for DOL includes an additional $25 million to target misclassification with 100 additional enforcement personnel and competitive grants to boost States’ incentives and capacity to address this problem.
With that in mind, it is clear from the proposed budget that the DOL, having been publicly thrashed in the recent GAO report on employee misclassification, not only has a mandate to get with the program, but will have funding to carry that mandate out.
Now of course the budget has to pass, but of all the items in the budget that are at risk, this is probably not one of them; the measure pays for itself many times over with the revenue capture it involves.
So What Else Is In the Obama Budget That Impacts IC Compliance?
If you're excited about a $25 million increase to fund the DOL's joint project with the IRS, how about an investment of over $8 billion in the Internal Revenue Service’s enforcement and modernization programs? The budget ". . . supports significant new revenue-generating initiatives that will target critical areas of non-compliance, and enhances a multi-year modernization strategy that will deliver a vastly improved IRS within the next five years."
$8 Billion Dollars? What Do They Mean, "Critical Areas of Non-Compliance?"
Here's a longer excerpt:
The Budget supports the IRS’ continued progress in reducing the tax gap through fair,
I'll be preparing a separate article covering the nature of this aforementioned tax gap, and where it comes from, so that you can more adeptly read between the lines on this budget item. I'll back up this statement in that forthcoming post, but for now, suffice to say that the lion's share of the tax gap is due to non-filing or under-reporting of taxes on behalf of individual sole proprietors (1099s) and self-incorporated independent contractors -- many of whom the IRS believes to be misclassified. When the IRS refers to targeting "critical areas of non-compliance" I think you know what I am saying.
So $25 million for DOL to get its act together on misclassification is surely exciting, but I find the $8 billion modernization project for the IRS nothing to sniff at. And that's not all, either. Back to the DOL section of the budget, the $25 million for the joint IRS-DOL employee misclassification enforcement program isn't the only line item to pay attention to.
Worker Protection Programs, Too . . . With Overflow Results
How about a $67 million increase for DOL's worker protection programs? The Wage and Hour compliance division alone of DOL would get $20 million of this additional funding for 2011, hiring an additional 90 investigators. While this division of DOL is not specifically targeted at misclassified employees, as we all know, the fact of workers being misclassified means that virtually all other areas of worker protections aren't being handled correctly, including wage and hour.
Here is the Obama budget excerpt:
The Budget includes a $67 million (4 percent) increase for the Department’s worker protection agencies to ensure they have the resources to meet their responsibilities to protect the health, safety, wages and working conditions, and retirement security of the nation’s workforce. The 2011 Budget builds on the 2010 Budget policy of returning
What's the Takeaway?
These budget provisions, taken together, illustrate a theme that I'm seeing consistently across the courts, in the Congress, and now here in the budgets of regulatory agencies. President Obama mentions in his preface to the budget that the horizon is beckoning. I'd name that horizon, "Compliance."
For a long time, businesses have been able to shrug at the complexity, roll the dice, and expect to get away with practices that were not fully compliant with the law (if they could even figure out what that would mean in practice!). Now, as we enter a new decade, the stakes are being raised, and I think the odds are getting harsher. Lady Luck has left the room.
Some things to expect over the next two to five years:
It isn't pretty. Especially for well meaning businesses that have no malicious intention of violating the law. Especially when we are in the midst of a workforce transformation that will see as much as 50% of the jobs created during the recovery hired as contingent labor, according to data published last year by Littler Mendelson.
You've got some time, but not a lot. Use it well. Commentsanonymous at 02/18/2010 17:09:00This is a big concern from those of us who choose to work as contractors. While I'm sure there are some abuses, many of us prefer to work as contractors instead of as captive employees. In the high-tech industry, the high hourly rates more than compensate for the lack of benefits. Plus, I get to choose my own benefits and am not dependent upon an employer's choices. The flexibility and lower stress levels (from not having to deal with office politics) make it a great lifestyle choice. Most of us, however, have to use staffing firms as the employer so that companies can protect themselves. I've also had to leave many enjoyable assignments before I wanted to because they have rules against keeping contractors around for more than a year. I think the rules need to be revamped so that people like me, who want to work on a contract basis, can have that option without the company having problems. I wonder if any of those who create these new enforcement initiatives have ever actually spoken to any of us in the contract world? Most of the time, anything you read talks about how some office temps are paid paltry wages and denied benefits by the evil employer. That's nowhere near the whole picture of contract workers. They need to talk to some highly-skilled and well-paid contractors, perhaps in the high-tech industry, before they tar everyone with the same brush. I don't think my pay rates of $70+/hour (W-2 via the staffing firm) are abusive in any way. And I'm certainly paying my fair share of taxes on that. MTEC Business Resources at 02/18/2010 12:15:10This article is very illuminating! The arrest (and recent conviction and sentencing) of two Philadelphia-based "temporary staffing agencies" would be powerful anecdotal evidence of employee "misclassification" gone wild. While the parties involved in the case mentioned above truly deserved to be flagged and brought down, accusations from IRS entrapment to racism were levelled (the majority of the workers involved were of Vietnamese origin). It is just the pandora's box of what is to come in terms of enforcing tax codes that have some merit and interferring with business's attempts at managing the bottom line (thru controlling employee expenses). You hit on a great point in that the nature of many jobs or professional services today may not warrant the individual performing them to be a full-time W-2 employee. There are many individuals who do not want to classified as someone's "employee" for reasons of their own. The City of Philadelphia is a strict adherer to the IRS code and I have have butted heads with their Revenue office over this a few times, but I have always managed to support my assertions by having clients document their relationship with workers in as detailed a way as possible, always looking for descriptions, job requirements, etc. in their documents that could be interpreted in more than one way. Once again, a very informative and enlightening article. You won't see this on the mainstream news programs because any economic recovery this administration is taking credit for might come to a halt. Add Comment |
Recent NewsNew Study Details Strategies for Managing the Contingent Labor Umbrella, Including Independent ContractorsAugust 12, 2010 -- New research on contingent workforce management from Aberdeen highlights a new trend in independent contractor and SOW consultant management: a dramatic increase in the use of Independent Contractor Engagement Specialists (ICES) that help businesses reduce the risks of engaging independent contractors and other contract workers, including misclassification and co-employment risk. New ResearchManazing the Complexities of the Contingent Labor UmbrellaThis latest research from Aberdeen reports on the dramatic growth in the use of independent contractors, SOW consultants, and services spend, and gives insights on how Best-in-Class organizations are navigating the contingent labor landscape. This year, the report has an expanded scope to include new categories of spend in the contingent workforce, including project / services spend. Download MBO White PaperMaximizing Talent, Minimizing Risk: Approaches for Compliant Independent Contractor EngagementConventional Contingent Workforce Management (CWM) approaches are weak when it comes to independent contractors. But recent innovations are being integrated into VMS/MSP programs with powerful results. This whitepaper shows how to focus on the root cause of independent contractor challenges, rather than symptoms, and reap significant risk mitigation. Talk With Our ExpertsCall 1-800-220-0469, or complete this form. Our experts will be in touch promptly. |



anonymous at 02/24/2010 19:29:32
This country is in very big trouble!!!